Conventional wisdom, meta-analysis, and research revision in economics

Author
Gechert, Sebastian
Mey, Bianka
Opatrny, Matej
Stanley, T. D.
Bom, Pedro R. D.
Doucouliagos, Hristos
Heimberger, Philipp
Rachinger, Heiko J.
Publication date
2024Published in
Journal of Economic SurveysISBN / ISSN
ISSN: 0950-0804ISBN / ISSN
eISSN: 1467-6419Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
This publication has a published version with DOI 10.1111/joes.12630
Abstract
Over the past several decades, meta-analysis has emerged as a widely accepted tool to understand economics research. Meta-analyses often challenge the established conventional wisdom of their respective fields. We systematically review a wide range of influential meta-analyses in economics and compare them to "conventional wisdom." After correcting for observable biases, the empirical economic effects are typically much closer to zero and sometimes switch signs. Typically, the relative reduction in effect sizes is 45%-60%.
Keywords
conventional wisdom, meta-analysis, systematic review
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2703License
Full text of this result is licensed under: Creative Commons Uveďte původ-Neužívejte dílo komerčně-Nezpracovávejte 4.0 International