Skip to main content

Research publications repository

    • čeština
    • English
  • English 
    • čeština
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   CU Research Publications Repository
  • Vysokoškolské ústavy
  • Environment Center
  • View Item
  • CU Research Publications Repository
  • Vysokoškolské ústavy
  • Environment Center
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Farmers' risk preferences in 11 European farming systems: A multi-country replication of Bocqueho et al. (2014)

original article
Creative Commons License IconCreative Commons BY IconCreative Commons NC Icon
accepted version
  • no other version
Thumbnail
File can be accessed.Get publication
Author
Rommel, Jens
Sagebiel, Julian
Baaken, Marieke Cornelia
Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus
Bougherara, Douadia
Cembalo, Luigi
Cerjak, Marija
Cop, Tajana
Czajkowski, Mikolaj
Espinosa-Goded, Maria
Hohler, Julia
Kuhfuss, Laure
Lagerkvist, Carl-Johan
Lapierre, Margaux
Lefebvre, Marianne
Matzdorf, Bettina
Ott, Edward
Paparella, Antonio
Quendler, Erika
Rodriguez-Entrena, Macario
Schulze, Christoph
Sumrada, Tanja
Tensi, Annika
Thoyer, Sophie
Maksan, Marina Tomic
Vecchio, Riccardo
Willinger, Marc
Zagorska, Katarzyna

Show other authors

Publication date
2023
Published in
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Volume / Issue
45 (3)
ISBN / ISSN
ISSN: 2040-5790
ISBN / ISSN
eISSN: 2040-5804
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Environment Center

This publication has a published version with DOI 10.1002/aepp.13330

Abstract
We replicate Bocqueho et al. (2014), who used multiple price lists to investigate the risk preferences of 107 French farmers. We collected new data from 1430 participants in 11 European farming systems. In agreement with the original study, farmers' risk preferences are best described by Cumulative Prospect Theory. Structural model estimates show that farmers in the new samples are, on average, less loss averse and more susceptible to probability distortion than in the original study. Explorative analyses indicate differences between estimation approaches, as well as heterogeneity between and within samples. We discuss challenges in replications of economic experiments with farmers across farming contexts.
Keywords
agriculture, artefactual field experiment, cumulative prospect theory, expected utility theory, risk attitudes
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2470
Show publication in other systems
WOS:000871853800001
SCOPUS:2-s2.0-85140369539
License

Full text of this result is licensed under: Creative Commons Uveďte původ-Neužívejte dílo komerčně 4.0 International

Show license terms

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-publication-version-

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

About Repository

About This RepositoryResearch outputs typologyRequired metadataDisclaimerCC Linceses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV