Skip to main content

Research publications repository

    • čeština
    • English
  • English 
    • čeština
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   CU Research Publications Repository
  • Fakulty
  • Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen
  • View Item
  • CU Research Publications Repository
  • Fakulty
  • Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Survival in Thyroid Cancer in Sweden From 1999 To 2018

original article
Creative Commons License IconCreative Commons BY IconCreative Commons NC Icon
published version
  • no other version
Thumbnail
File can be accessed.Get publication
Author
Zitrický, FrantišekORCiD Profile - 0000-0001-7600-7143
Koskinen, Anni
Sundquist, Kristina
Sundquist, Jan
Liška, VáclavORCiD Profile - 0000-0002-5226-0280WoS Profile - Q-4402-2017Scopus Profile - 8705914800
Försti, Asta
Hemminki, Akseli
Hemminki, Kari JussiORCiD Profile - 0000-0002-2769-3316

Show other authors

Publication date
2024
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology
Volume / Issue
16 (2 October 2024)
ISBN / ISSN
ISSN: 1179-1349
ISBN / ISSN
eISSN: 1179-1349
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen

This publication has a published version with DOI 10.2147/CLEP.S467874

Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Thyroid cancer (TC) is diagnosed in several histological types which differ in their clinical characteristics and survival. We aim to describe how they influence TC survival in Sweden. METHODS: Cancer data were obtained from the Swedish cancer registry between years 1999 and 2018, and these were used to analyze relative survival. RESULTS: Relative survival for all TC improved when analyzed in 10-year periods, and female survival improved more than male survival. Female survival advantage appeared to be present also for specific histological types, although case numbers were low for rare types. Female 5-year relative survival for TC was 100% for follicular, 95.1% for oncocytic, 93.4% for papillary, 89.7% for medullary, and 6.1% for anaplastic cancer. Among the clinical TNM classes, only T4 and M1 stages were associated with decreased survival compared to T1-3 and M0. Anaplastic cancer presented most often at high T and M1 stages, in contrast to other TC. Curiously, the diagnostic age for anaplastic M1 patients was lower than that for M0 patients. Both anaplastic and medullary cancers did not show age-dependent increases in the probability of metastases, in contrast to the main histological types. This could indicate the presence of several types of anaplastic and medullary cancers. CONCLUSION: The poor survival for anaplastic TC is an extreme contrast to the excellent survival of differentiated TC. As less than 20% of anaplastic cancer patients survived one year, urgent diagnosis and initiation of treatment are important. Facilitated treatment pathways have been instituted in Denmark resulting in improved survival. Anaplastic cancer should be a target of a major research focus.
Keywords
anaplastic cancer, metastasis, prognosis, relative survival, trends
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2726
Show publication in other systems
WOS:001329074400001
SCOPUS:2-s2.0-85206874887
PUBMED:39371051
License

Full text of this result is licensed under: Creative Commons Uveďte původ-Neužívejte dílo komerčně 3.0 Unported

Show license terms

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-publication-version-

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

About Repository

About This RepositoryResearch outputs typologyRequired metadataDisclaimerCC Linceses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV