Skip to main content

Research publications repository

    • čeština
    • English
  • English 
    • čeština
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   CU Research Publications Repository
  • Fakulty
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
  • View Item
  • CU Research Publications Repository
  • Fakulty
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Physics
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Denoising of dual-VENC PC-MRI with large high/low VENC ratios

original article
Creative Commons License IconCreative Commons BY Icon
published version
  • no other version
Thumbnail
File can be accessed.Get publication
Author
Brunátová, JanaORCiD Profile - 0009-0000-5948-233X
Löcke, Miriam
Uribe, Sergio
Bertoglio, Cristóbal

Show other authors

Publication date
2024
Published in
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Volume / Issue
Volume 93 (January 2025)
ISBN / ISSN
ISSN: 0740-3194
ISBN / ISSN
eISSN: 1522-2594
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Faculty of Mathematics and Physics

This publication has a published version with DOI 10.1002/mrm.30278

Abstract
Purpose: Dual velocity encoding PC-MRI can produce spurious artifacts whenusing high ratios of velocity encoding values (VENCs), limiting its ability to gen-erate high-quality images across a wide range of encoding velocities. This studyaims to propose and compare dual-VENC correction methods for such artifacts. Theory and Methods: Two denoisingapproachesbasedonspatiotemporalreg-ularization are proposed and compared with a state-of-the-art method based onsign correction. Accuracy is assessed using simulated data from an aorta andbrain aneurysm, as well as 8 two-dimensional (2D) PC-MRI ascending aortadatasets. Two temporal resolutions (30,60) ms and noise levels (9,12) dB areconsidered, with noise added to the complex magnetization. The error is evalu-ated with respect to the noise-free measurement in the synthetic case and to theunwrapped image without additional noise in the volunteer datasets. Results: In all studied cases, the proposed methods are more accurate than theSign Correction technique. Using simulated 2D+T data from the aorta (60 ms,9 dB), the Dual-VENC (DV) error 0.82 +/- 0.07 is reduced to: 0.66 +/- 0.04 (SignCorrection);0.34 +/- 0.04and0.32 +/- 0.04(proposedtechniques).Themethodsarefound to be significantly different (p-value<0.05). Importantly, brain aneurysmdatarevealedthattheSignCorrectionmethodisnotsuitable,asitincreaseserrorwhen the flow is not unidirectional. All three methods improve the accuracy ofin vivo data. Conclusion:The newly proposed methods outperform the Sign Correctionmethod in improving dual-VENC PC-MRI images. Among them, the approachbased on temporal differences has shown the highest accuracy.
Keywords
denoising, dual-VENC, phase-contrast MRI,
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2952
Show publication in other systems
WOS:001314786600001
SCOPUS:2-s2.0-85204242485
PUBMED:39290071
License

Full text of this result is licensed under: Creative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 International

Show license terms

xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-publication-version-

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

About Repository

About This RepositoryResearch outputs typologyRequired metadataDisclaimerCC Linceses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionWorkplacesBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV