Zobrazit minimální záznam

The evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samples

dc.contributor.authorKrůtová, Marcela
dc.contributor.authorBrajerová, Marie
dc.contributor.authorKepka, Zdeněk
dc.contributor.authorBriksí, Aleš
dc.contributor.authorHubáček, Petr
dc.contributor.authorDřevínek, Pavel
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-20T08:28:01Z
dc.date.available2023-01-20T08:28:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/1648
dc.description.abstractBackground The rapid diagnostics tests for SARS-CoV-2 antigen vary in their sensitivities, and moreover, genomic mutations may further affect the performance of the assays. We aimed to evaluate the analytical performance of an automated antigen assay and compare its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant positive clinical samples. Material and methods The analytical performance of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test was evaluated on a population of community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic investigated by the RT-qPCR AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the antigen test were evaluated on prospective 621 nasopharyngeal swabs along with oropharyngeal swabs. The sensitivity regarding variants determined by the AllplexTM SARS-CoV-2 Variant assays was analysed in additional, retrospective 158 Delta and 59 Omicron samples. Results The overall sensitivity of the antigen test in prospective samples was 77.9% (113/145; 95% confidence interval [CI] 70.3-84.4) with the specificity of 99.8% (95% CI 98.8-100). Regarding the variant, the sensitivity was higher in Omicron-variant samples, 93.2% (55/59; 95% CI 83.5-98.1), compared to Delta-variant samples, 71.5% (113/158; 95% CI 63.8-78.4; p = .001). Conclusion In community-dwelling subjects with mild respiratory symptoms or being asymptomatic, the automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test showed high sensitivity over 98.0% in subgroup samples with cycle threshold (Ct) values < 25. Regarding the variant, the antigen test sensitivity was higher in the Omicron-variant samples compared to the Delta-variant samples. The analytical performance of the antigen test can differ between the SARS-CoV-2 variants, and a re-evaluation should be performed for new circulating lineages.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1111/irv.13048
dc.rightsCreative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.titleThe evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samplesen
dcterms.accessRightsembargoedAccess
dcterms.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
dc.date.updated2023-10-02T06:13:56Z
dc.subject.keywordDeltaen
dc.subject.keywordOmicronen
dc.subject.keywordSARS-CoV-2en
dc.subject.keywordantigen testingen
dc.subject.keywordsensitivityen
dc.rights.startDate2022-09-06
dc.relation.fundingReferenceinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MSM//LX22NPO5103
dc.relation.fundingReferenceinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UK/COOP/COOP
dc.relation.fundingReferenceinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FN/I-FN/I-FNM
dc.date.embargoStartDate2023-10-02
dc.date.embargoEndDate2022-09-06
dc.type.obd73
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/irv.13048
dc.identifier.utWos000850137600001
dc.identifier.eidScopus2-s2.0-85138275492
dc.identifier.obd614209
dc.identifier.rivRIV/00216208:11130/22:10446551
dc.identifier.pubmed36065770
dc.subject.rivPrimary30000::30300::30303
dcterms.isPartOf.nameInfluenza and other Respiratory Viruses [online]
dcterms.isPartOf.issn1750-2640
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2022
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume16
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue6
uk.faculty.primaryId109
uk.faculty.primaryName2. lékařská fakultacs
uk.faculty.primaryNameSecond Faculty of Medicineen
uk.faculty.secondaryId52
uk.faculty.secondaryNameFakultní nemocnice v Motolecs
uk.faculty.secondaryNameMotol University Hospitalen
uk.department.primaryId109
uk.department.primaryName2. lékařská fakultacs
uk.department.primaryNameSecond Faculty of Medicineen
uk.department.secondaryId1701
uk.department.secondaryId100010693902
uk.department.secondaryNameÚstav lékařské mikrobiologiecs
uk.department.secondaryNameÚstav lékařské mikrobiologieen
uk.department.secondaryNameÚstav lékařské mikrobiologie 2. LF UK a FN Motolcs
uk.department.secondaryNameDepartment of Medical Microbiology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine and Motol University Hospitalen
dc.description.pageRange1033-1039
dc.type.obdHierarchyCsČLÁNEK V ČASOPISU::článek v časopisu::původní článekcs
dc.type.obdHierarchyEnJOURNAL ARTICLE::journal article::original articleen
dc.type.obdHierarchyCode73::152::206en
uk.displayTitleThe evaluation of an automated mariPOC SARS-CoV-2 antigen test compared to RT-qPCR SARS-CoV-2 assay and comparison of its sensitivity in Delta- and Omicron-variant samplesen


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam