Zobrazit minimální záznam

Genetic analysis challenges the presence of Ixodes inopinatus in Central Europe: Development of a multiplex PCR to distinguish I. inopinatus from I. ricinus

dc.contributor.authorHrazdilová, Kristýna
dc.contributor.authorDaněk, Ondřej
dc.contributor.authorHrbatová, Alena
dc.contributor.authorČervená, Barbora
dc.contributor.authorNosková, Eva
dc.contributor.authorAdamík, Peter
dc.contributor.authorVotýpka, Jan
dc.contributor.authorMihalca, Andrei Daniel
dc.contributor.authorNoureddine, Mechouk
dc.contributor.authorModrý, David
dc.contributor.authorŽůrek, Luděk
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-31T16:10:28Z
dc.date.available2023-10-31T16:10:28Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2058
dc.description.abstractBackground Ixodes ricinus is an important vector of several pathogens, primarily in Europe. Recently, Ixodes inopinatus was described from Spain, Portugal, and North Africa and then reported from several European countries. In this study, a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was developed to distinguish I. ricinus from I. inopinatus and used in the surveillance of I. inopinatus in Algeria (ALG) and three regions in the Czech Republic (CZ). Methods A multiplex PCR on TROSPA and sequencing of several mitochondrial (16S rDNA, COI) and nuclear markers (TROSPA, ITS2, calreticulin) were used to differentiate these two species and for a subsequent phylogenetic analysis. Results Sequencing of TROSPA, COI, and ITS2 separated these two species into two subclades, while 16S rDNA and calreticulin could not distinguish I. ricinus from I. inopinatus. Interestingly, 23 nucleotide positions in the TROSPA gene had consistently double peaks in a subset of ticks from CZ. Cloning of these PCR products led to a clear separation of I. ricinus and I. inopinatus indicating hybridization and introgression between these two tick taxa. Based on a multiplex PCR of TROSPA and analysis of sequences of TROSPA, COI, and ITS2, the majority of ticks in CZ were I. ricinus, no I. inopinatus ticks were found, and 10 specimens showed signs of hybridization. In contrast, most ticks in ALG were I. inopinatus, four ticks were I. ricinus, and no signs of hybridization and introgression were detected. Conclusions We developed a multiplex PCR method based on the TROSPA gene to differentiate I. ricinus and I. inopinatus. We demonstrate the lack of evidence for the presence of I. inopinatus in Central Europe and propose that previous studies be re-examined. Mitochondrial markers are not suitable for distinguishing I. inopinatus from I. ricinus. Furthermore, our data indicate that I. inopinatus and I. ricinus can hybridize, and the hybrids can survive in Europe.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.urlhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-023-05971-2
dc.rightsCreative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 Internationalcs
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 Internationalen
dc.titleGenetic analysis challenges the presence of Ixodes inopinatus in Central Europe: Development of a multiplex PCR to distinguish I. inopinatus from I. ricinusen
dcterms.accessRightsopenAccess
dcterms.licensehttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
dc.date.updated2023-11-07T08:14:10Z
dc.subject.keywordTicken
dc.subject.keywordIxodes ricinusen
dc.subject.keywordIxodes inopinatusen
dc.subject.keyword16S rDNAen
dc.subject.keywordTROSPAen
dc.subject.keywordCOIen
dc.subject.keywordITS2en
dc.subject.keywordAlgeriaen
dc.subject.keywordCzech Republicen
dc.relation.fundingReferenceinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UK/COOP/COOP
dc.relation.fundingReferenceinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MSM//LX22NPO5103
dc.date.embargoStartDate2023-11-07
dc.type.obd73
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13071-023-05971-2
dc.identifier.utWos001083412600001
dc.identifier.eidScopus2-s2.0-85173345918
dc.identifier.obd637969
dc.identifier.pubmed37814284
dc.subject.rivPrimary10000::10600
dcterms.isPartOf.nameParasites & Vectors
dcterms.isPartOf.issn1756-3305
dcterms.isPartOf.journalYear2023
dcterms.isPartOf.journalVolume16
dcterms.isPartOf.journalIssue1
uk.faculty.primaryId115
uk.faculty.primaryNamePřírodovědecká fakultacs
uk.faculty.primaryNameFaculty of Scienceen
uk.faculty.secondaryId111
uk.faculty.secondaryNameLékařská fakulta v Plznics
uk.faculty.secondaryNameFaculty of Medicine in Pilsenen
uk.department.primaryId1038
uk.department.primaryNameKatedra parazitologiecs
uk.department.primaryNameDepartment of Parasitologyen
uk.department.secondaryId100012968318
uk.department.secondaryNameBiomedicínské centrumcs
uk.department.secondaryNameBiomedical Centeren
dc.type.obdHierarchyCsČLÁNEK V ČASOPISU::článek v časopisu::původní článekcs
dc.type.obdHierarchyEnJOURNAL ARTICLE::journal article::original articleen
dc.type.obdHierarchyCode73::152::206en
uk.displayTitleGenetic analysis challenges the presence of <em>Ixodes inopinatus</em> in Central Europe: Development of a multiplex PCR to distinguish <em>I. inopinatus</em> from<em> I. ricinus</em>en


Soubory tohoto záznamu

Thumbnail

Tento záznam se objevuje v následujících kolekcích

Zobrazit minimální záznam