Naturalizing Nous ? Theophrastus on Nous, Nature, and Motion
![Thumbnail](/bitstream/handle/20.500.14178/2632/phro-article-p468_4.pdf.jpg?sequence=5&isAllowed=y)
Publication date
2024Published in
PhronesisVolume / Issue
69 (4)ISBN / ISSN
ISSN: 0031-8868ISBN / ISSN
eISSN: 1568-5284Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
This publication has a published version with DOI 10.1163/15685284-bja10086
Abstract
There is prima facie evidence that Theophrastus naturalized nous to the extent that he spoke of it in naturalizing terms. But our evidence also suggests that Theophrastus accepted the reasons Aristotle had for excluding nous from the reach of natural philosophy. We show that, far from revealing an inconsistency on Theophrastus' part, this apparent tension results from a consciously adopted strategy. Theophrastus is developing one aspect of Aristotle's account of nous he found underdeveloped and feared might be misunderstood, namely the infrangible organic unity of the whole human being, including its nous. That is why he insists that nous, although 'from outside,' is 'grown together' with us, why he speaks of it as a nature (phusis), and why he insists that thought is a motion (kinêsis). We show how these striking claims can be understood against the broader background of Theophrastus' natural philosophy.
Keywords
Naturalizing, Theophrastus, Nous, Nature, Motion
Permanent link
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14178/2632License
Full text of this result is licensed under: Creative Commons Uveďte původ 4.0 International